A750 vs A580
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
A750 vs A580: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the A750 delivers approximately +7% higher frame rates compared to the A580 in 1080p Ultra (both featuring 8GB VRAM). For budget-conscious buyers, the A580 currently offers +6.5% better value, available at a $25.00 price difference.
A750 Advantages
Up to 7% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 46 vs 43 FPS
A580 Advantages
Up to 6.5% better value for money – $4.31 vs $4.59/FPS
Costs only 88% of the price – $185 vs $210 (12% cheaper)
Is newer – 2023-10-01 vs 2022-10-01
Consumes up to 18% less energy – 185W vs 225W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (54.7 ÷ 57.4) × 100 = 95%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((57.4 - 54.7) ÷ 54.7) × 100 = 5%
You naturally think: "If A580 is only 95% as fast, then A750 should be 5% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "5% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (95% of and 5% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (43 ÷ 45.8) × 100 = 94%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((45.8 - 43) ÷ 43) × 100 = 7%
You naturally think: "If A580 is only 94% as fast, then A750 should be 6% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "7% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (94% of and 7% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (27.6 ÷ 30.7) × 100 = 90%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((30.7 - 27.6) ÷ 27.6) × 100 = 11%
You naturally think: "If A580 is only 90% as fast, then A750 should be 10% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "11% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (90% of and 11% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (16.4 ÷ 17) × 100 = 96%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((17 - 16.4) ÷ 16.4) × 100 = 4%
You naturally think: "If A580 is only 96% as fast, then A750 should be 4% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "4% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (96% of and 4% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$