A580 vs RTX 3050 6GB
GPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
A580 vs RTX 3050 6GB: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the A580 delivers approximately +24% higher frame rates compared to the RTX 3050 6GB in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the A580 currently offers +31.4% better value, available at a $11.77 price difference.
A580 Advantages
Up to 24% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 43 vs 35 FPS
Up to 31.4% better value for money – $4.31 vs $5.66/FPS
Costs only 94% of the price – $185 vs $197 (6% cheaper)
33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
RTX 3050 6GB Advantages
Is newer – 2024-02-02 vs 2023-10-01
Consumes up to 62% less energy – 70W vs 185W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Medium
Entry / competitive gaming
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (50.9 ÷ 54.7) × 100 = 93%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((54.7 - 50.9) ÷ 50.9) × 100 = 7%
You naturally think: "If RTX 3050 6GB is only 93% as fast, then A580 should be 7% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "7% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (93% of and 7% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1080p Ultra
Full HD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (34.8 ÷ 43) × 100 = 81%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((43 - 34.8) ÷ 34.8) × 100 = 24%
You naturally think: "If RTX 3050 6GB is only 81% as fast, then A580 should be 19% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "24% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (81% of and 24% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
1440p Ultra
1440p QHD — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (22.9 ÷ 27.6) × 100 = 83%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((27.6 - 22.9) ÷ 22.9) × 100 = 21%
You naturally think: "If RTX 3050 6GB is only 83% as fast, then A580 should be 17% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "21% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (83% of and 21% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
4K Ultra
3840×2160 — max settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (11.2 ÷ 16.4) × 100 = 68%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((16.4 - 11.2) ÷ 11.2) × 100 = 46%
You naturally think: "If RTX 3050 6GB is only 68% as fast, then A580 should be 32% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "46% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (68% of and 46% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$