Core i9-14900K vs Core i9-13900K

CPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison

Core i9-14900K vs Core i9-13900K: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra

In gaming, the Core i9-14900K delivers approximately +5% higher frame rates compared to the Core i9-13900K in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the Core i9-13900K currently offers +11.9% better value, available at a $58.33 price difference.

Core i9-14900K Advantages

Up to 5% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 211 vs 200 FPS

Is newer – 2023-10-17 vs 2022-10-20

Core i9-13900K Advantages

Up to 11.9% better value for money – $1.63 vs $1.82/FPS

Costs only 85% of the price – $325 vs $383 (15% cheaper)

Performance Analytics

Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite

1080p Low

Full HD — min settings

AVG FPS
Core i9-14900K
210.8fps(100%)
Core i9-13900K
200fps(95%)
WinnerCore i9-14900K
+5% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (Core i9-13900K FPS ÷ Core i9-14900K FPS) × 100
Example: (200 ÷ 210.8) × 100 = 95%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((Core i9-14900K FPS - Core i9-13900K FPS) ÷ Core i9-13900K FPS) × 100
Example: ((210.8 - 200) ÷ 200) × 100 = 5%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If Core i9-13900K is only 95% as fast, then Core i9-14900K should be 5% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "5% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (95% of and 5% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)

Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$

Core i9-14900K
0.550 Value89% Efficiency
Core i9-13900K
0.615 Value100% Efficiency