Core i9-13900KS vs Core i7-13700K

CPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison

Core i9-13900KS vs Core i7-13700K: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra

In gaming, the Core i9-13900KS delivers approximately +3% higher frame rates compared to the Core i7-13700K in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the Core i7-13700K currently offers +84.7% better value, available at a $290 price difference.

Core i9-13900KS Advantages

Up to 3% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 202 vs 197 FPS

More processing cores – 24 vs 16 cores

Is newer – 2023-01-12 vs 2022-10-20

Core i7-13700K Advantages

Up to 84.7% better value for money – $1.65 vs $3.05/FPS

Costs only 53% of the price – $325 vs $615 (47% cheaper)

Consumes up to 17% less energy – 125W vs 150W

Performance Analytics

Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite

1080p Low

Full HD — min settings

AVG FPS
Core i9-13900KS
202fps(100%)
Core i7-13700K
197fps(98%)
WinnerCore i9-13900KS
+3% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (Core i7-13700K FPS ÷ Core i9-13900KS FPS) × 100
Example: (197 ÷ 202) × 100 = 98%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((Core i9-13900KS FPS - Core i7-13700K FPS) ÷ Core i7-13700K FPS) × 100
Example: ((202 - 197) ÷ 197) × 100 = 3%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If Core i7-13700K is only 98% as fast, then Core i9-13900KS should be 2% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "3% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (98% of and 3% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)

Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$

Core i9-13900KS
0.328 Value54% Efficiency
Core i7-13700K
0.606 Value100% Efficiency