Core i9-13900KS vs Core 9 285K
CPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
Core i9-13900KS vs Core 9 285K: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the Core i9-13900KS delivers approximately +4% higher frame rates compared to the Core 9 285K in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the Core 9 285K currently offers +29.5% better value, available at a $159 price difference.
Core i9-13900KS Advantages
Up to 4% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 202 vs 194 FPS
Core 9 285K Advantages
Up to 29.5% better value for money – $2.35 vs $3.05/FPS
Costs only 74% of the price – $457 vs $615 (26% cheaper)
Is newer – 2024-10-24 vs 2023-01-12
Consumes up to 17% less energy – 125W vs 150W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Low
Full HD — min settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (194.1 ÷ 202) × 100 = 96%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((202 - 194.1) ÷ 194.1) × 100 = 4%
You naturally think: "If Core 9 285K is only 96% as fast, then Core i9-13900KS should be 4% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "4% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (96% of and 4% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$