Core i9-13900K vs Core 9 285K
CPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
Core i9-13900K vs Core 9 285K: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the Core i9-13900K delivers approximately +3% higher frame rates compared to the Core 9 285K in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the Core i9-13900K currently offers +44.8% better value, available at a $132 price difference.
Core i9-13900K Advantages
Up to 3% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 200 vs 194 FPS
Up to 44.8% better value for money – $1.63 vs $2.35/FPS
Costs only 71% of the price – $325 vs $457 (29% cheaper)
Core 9 285K Advantages
Is newer – 2024-10-24 vs 2022-10-20
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Low
Full HD — min settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (194.1 ÷ 200) × 100 = 97%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((200 - 194.1) ÷ 194.1) × 100 = 3%
You naturally think: "If Core 9 285K is only 97% as fast, then Core i9-13900K should be 3% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "3% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (97% of and 3% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$