Core i9-12900K vs Core i5-13400
CPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
Core i9-12900K vs Core i5-13400: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the Core i9-12900K delivers approximately +12% higher frame rates compared to the Core i5-13400 in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the Core i5-13400 currently offers +65.0% better value, available at a $153 price difference.
Core i9-12900K Advantages
Up to 12% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 172 vs 153 FPS
More processing cores – 16 vs 10 cores
Core i5-13400 Advantages
Up to 65.0% better value for money – $1.17 vs $1.93/FPS
Costs only 54% of the price – $179 vs $332 (46% cheaper)
Is newer – 2023-01-03 vs 2021-11-04
Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65W vs 125W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Low
Full HD — min settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (153 ÷ 172) × 100 = 89%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((172 - 153) ÷ 153) × 100 = 12%
You naturally think: "If Core i5-13400 is only 89% as fast, then Core i9-12900K should be 11% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "12% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (89% of and 12% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$