Core i7-13700K vs Core 9 285K

CPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison

Core i7-13700K vs Core 9 285K: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra

In gaming, the Core i7-13700K delivers approximately +1% higher frame rates compared to the Core 9 285K in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the Core i7-13700K currently offers +42.6% better value, available at a $132 price difference.

Core i7-13700K Advantages

Up to 1% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 197 vs 194 FPS

Up to 42.6% better value for money – $1.65 vs $2.35/FPS

Costs only 71% of the price – $325 vs $457 (29% cheaper)

Core 9 285K Advantages

More processing cores – 24 vs 16 cores

Is newer – 2024-10-24 vs 2022-10-20

Performance Analytics

Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite

1080p Low

Full HD — min settings

AVG FPS
Core i7-13700K
197fps(100%)
Core 9 285K
194.1fps(99%)
WinnerCore i7-13700K
+1% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (Core 9 285K FPS ÷ Core i7-13700K FPS) × 100
Example: (194.1 ÷ 197) × 100 = 99%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((Core i7-13700K FPS - Core 9 285K FPS) ÷ Core 9 285K FPS) × 100
Example: ((197 - 194.1) ÷ 194.1) × 100 = 1%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If Core 9 285K is only 99% as fast, then Core i7-13700K should be 1% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "1% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (99% of and 1% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)

Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$

Core i7-13700K
0.606 Value100% Efficiency
Core 9 285K
0.425 Value70% Efficiency