Core i5-12600K vs Core i5-12400
CPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
Core i5-12600K vs Core i5-12400: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the Core i5-12600K delivers approximately +11% higher frame rates compared to the Core i5-12400 in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the Core i5-12400 currently offers +17.0% better value, available at a $47.13 price difference.
Core i5-12600K Advantages
Up to 11% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 157 vs 142 FPS
More processing cores – 10 vs 6 cores
Core i5-12400 Advantages
Up to 17.0% better value for money – $1.13 vs $1.32/FPS
Costs only 77% of the price – $161 vs $208 (23% cheaper)
Is newer – 2022-01-04 vs 2021-11-04
Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65W vs 125W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Low
Full HD — min settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (142 ÷ 157) × 100 = 90%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((157 - 142) ÷ 142) × 100 = 11%
You naturally think: "If Core i5-12400 is only 90% as fast, then Core i5-12600K should be 10% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "11% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (90% of and 11% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$