Core i5-12400 vs Core i3-12100
CPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison
Core i5-12400 vs Core i3-12100: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra
In gaming, the Core i5-12400 delivers approximately +13% higher frame rates compared to the Core i3-12100 in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the Core i3-12100 currently offers +52.9% better value, available at a $67.47 price difference.
Core i5-12400 Advantages
Up to 13% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 142 vs 126 FPS
More processing cores – 6 vs 4 cores
Core i3-12100 Advantages
Up to 52.9% better value for money – $0.74 vs $1.13/FPS
Costs only 58% of the price – $93.24 vs $161 (42% cheaper)
Consumes up to 8% less energy – 60W vs 65W
Performance Analytics
Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite
1080p Low
Full HD — min settings
When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:
This compares the slower card to the faster card.
Example: (126 ÷ 142) × 100 = 89%
This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.
Example: ((142 - 126) ÷ 126) × 100 = 13%
You naturally think: "If Core i3-12100 is only 89% as fast, then Core i5-12400 should be 11% faster" — but that's incorrect.
The "13% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (89% of and 13% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.
Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)
Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$