Core 9 285K vs Core 5 245K

CPU Head-to-Head · FPS & Value Comparison

Core 9 285K vs Core 5 245K: Gaming Performance Comparison in 1080p Ultra

In gaming, the Core 9 285K delivers approximately +8% higher frame rates compared to the Core 5 245K in 1080p Ultra. For budget-conscious buyers, the Core 5 245K currently offers +126.7% better value, available at a $270 price difference.

Core 9 285K Advantages

Up to 8% faster in gaming benchmarks on average – 194 vs 180 FPS

More processing cores – 24 vs 14 cores

Core 5 245K Advantages

Up to 126.7% better value for money – $1.04 vs $2.35/FPS

Costs only 41% of the price – $187 vs $457 (59% cheaper)

Performance Analytics

Average FPS across 21 games · all benchmarks use the same test suite

1080p Low

Full HD — min settings

AVG FPS
Core 9 285K
194.1fps(100%)
Core 5 245K
180.2fps(93%)
WinnerCore 9 285K
+8% faster
General Explanation of Benchmark Percentages

When you see two FPS numbers, there are two common but different ways to show the difference:

"X% of the performance"

This compares the slower card to the faster card.

Formula: (Core 5 245K FPS ÷ Core 9 285K FPS) × 100
Example: (180.2 ÷ 194.1) × 100 = 93%
"X% faster"

This shows how much more the faster card performs compared to the slower one.

Formula: ((Core 9 285K FPS - Core 5 245K FPS) ÷ Core 5 245K FPS) × 100
Example: ((194.1 - 180.2) ÷ 180.2) × 100 = 8%
Why Someone Might Get Confused:

You naturally think: "If Core 5 245K is only 93% as fast, then Core 9 285K should be 7% faster" — but that's incorrect.

The "8% faster" is measured against the slower card, not against the faster one. So both numbers (93% of and 8% faster) are mathematically correct at the same time.

Efficiency Coefficient 1080p Ultra (Higher = Better Value)

Performance delivered per currency unit: FPS/$

Core 9 285K
0.425 Value44% Efficiency
Core 5 245K
0.964 Value100% Efficiency